In Munnesh v. State of UP (2025 SC), the Supreme Court issued new guidelines on bail and anticipatory bail, mandating petitioners to disclose their criminal antecedents in the petition synopsis. Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan warned that false ...
In State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (2025 SC), the Supreme Court laid down 4 key principles for setting aside an entire selection process due to irregularities, upholding the cancellation of 25,000 teaching and non-teaching appointment...
In Management of Worth Trust v. The Secretary, Worth Trust Workers Union (2025 SC), the Supreme Court ruled that charitable trusts running factories cannot deny workers their bonus rights under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, emphasizing employee wel...
In Jomon KK v. Shajimon P (2025 SC), the Supreme Court clarified that there is no universal rule to prefer candidates with higher qualifications over those with the essential qualification in government jobs, emphasizing fairness in the selection pro...
In Dabur India Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (2025 Bombay HC), the Bombay High Court ordered Dabur to remove terms like “anti-inflammatory,” “anti-bacterial,” and “analgesic” from its Dabur Meswak and Dabur Herb’l Anti-Bacterial Toothpaste Tulsi labels...
In Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025 SC), the Supreme Court quashed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgadhi, clarifying Section 173(3) BNSS 2023 on preliminary enquiry before FIR registration and emphasizing the protection of freedom o...
In a landmark ruling in Ashish Kakkar v. UT of Chandigarh (2025 SC), the Supreme Court clarified that an arrest memo does not fulfill the requirement of supplying grounds of arrest under Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 202...
After a 17-year legal battle, the Chandigarh Court acquitted Justice Nirmal Yadav and three others in the ₹15 lakh judicial controversy on March 29, 2025. The CBI case, originating in 2008, involved a misdelivered cash packet meant for Justice Yadav ...
In a landmark ruling in NRAI v. UOI (2025), the Delhi High Court declared that restaurant service charge is not mandatory, upholding the CCPA guidelines of 2022. Justice Prathiba M. Singh emphasized that service charges are voluntary, rejecting manda...
The Supreme Court recalls 2019 order that allowed tree felling in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) without prior permission, reinforcing environmental protection in MC Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. (2025). Addressing illegal felling of 454 trees in Math...
